The Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance: An Empirical Investigation

Author(s)

Muhammad Rizwan , Humera Asrar , Noman Alam Siddiqui , Waqar uddin Usmani ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 11-27 | Views: 369 | Downloads: 107 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3464888

Volume 5 - September 2016 (09)

Abstract

Pakistan is an emerging economy which is based on financial performance of business organization. Sustainable financial growth of corporations depends on effective board performance. The study aimed to reflect the presence of effective principle based corporate governance in Pakistan and its impact on financial performance of a company. The reason to select this topic is, that in Pakistan as yet the complete model of financial performance have not been used to find out the above said relationship. The data was collected from top 20 companies which got registered in the Karachi Stock Exchange during the period 2007 to 2014. Financial performance of these organizations were measured by different financial ratios like Tobin’s Q, ROA, MB, ROE and etc. while the inside ownership, board size, board independence, board diversity, presence of audit and remuneration committees and dividend payout ratios were taken as indicators of the corporate governance under the guide lines of the code of corporate governance 2002 and 2012 regulated by the Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP). Results revealed that the inside ownership, board size, presence of independent/non-executive directors, dividend payout ratio and presence of audit committee had significant impact on organization’s financial performance while the presence of remuneration committee and board diversity had no impact on firm’s financial performance. 

Keywords

 corporate governance. Financial performance, Pakistan, SECP 

References

  1. Adenikinju O, Ayorinde F (2001). ―Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate performance: The case of Nigerian quoted companies‖. Paper presented at the AERC biannual research workshop, Nairobi. Kenya.
  2. Aggarwal R, Isil E, Rene S, Rohan W (2007). ―Do U.S. Firms Have the Best Corporate Governance? A CrossCountry Examination of the Relation between Corporate Governance and Shareholder Wealth‖, NBER Working Paper 12819.
  3. Ali Adnan Ibrahim, Corporate Governance in Pakistan: Analysis of Current Challenges and Recommendations for Future Reforms, 5 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 323 (2006)
  4. Anderson R, Mansi S, Reeb D (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity and the cost of debt, J. Account. Econ., 37: 315-342.
  5. Baysinger B, Butler H (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: performance effects of changes in board composition, J. Law Econ.Org., 1:101-124.
  6. Baysinger B, Hoskisson RE (1990). ―The Composition of Board of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy.‖ Acad. Manage. Rev., 15: 72-87.
  7. Bhagat S, Black B (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long- term firm performance, J. Corp. Law. 27: 231-274.
  8. Black BS, Tang H, Kim W (2003). Does corporate governance affect firm value? Evidence from Korea. Working Paper No. 237, Stanford Law School.
  9. Bokpin GA, Kyereboah CA, Aboagye AQQ (2006). ―Corporate governance and shareholder wealth maximization: Evidence from listed companies in Ghana‖, paper presented at the 3rd Afr. Fin. J. Conf. Ghana, 12th – 13th July 2009.
  10. Brown LD, Robinson JM, Caylor MC (2004). Corporate governance and firm performance. http://www.issproxy.com/pdf/corporate governance. Carline NF, Linn SC, Yadav V (2002). "The Influence of Managerial Ownership on the Real Gains in Corporate Mergers and Market Revaluation of Merger Partners: Empirical Evidence." Working Paper. Cho M (1998). Ownership structure, investment and the corporate value: an empirical analysis, J. Finan. Econ., 47: 103-121.
  11. Coles J, Daniel N, Naveen L (2008). Boards: does one size fit all? J. Finan. Econ., 79: 431- 468.
  12. Demsetz H, Villalonga B (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance, J. Corporate Finan., 7: 209- 233.
  13. Eisenberg T, Sundgren S, Wells M (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms, J. Finan. Econ., 48: 35-54.
  14. Forsberg R (1989). Outside directors and managerial monitoring, Akron Business and Economic Review. 20: 24- 32.
  15. Friend I, Lang I (1988). ―An Empirical Test of the Impact of Managerial Self-Interest on Corporate Capital Structure‖. J. Fin., 43: 271-281.
  16. Gompers PA, Ishii J, Metrick A (2003). ―Corporate Governance and Equity Prices.‖ Quarterly J. Econ., 118(1): 107-155.
  17. Goswami O (2002). ―Corporate Governance in India,‖ Taking Action against Corruption in Asia and the Pacific (Manila: Asian Development Bank), 85-106.
  18. Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance, Finan. Manag.. 20: 101- 112.
  19. Himmelberg C, Hubbard G, Palia D (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance, J. Finan. Econ., 53: 353-384.
  20. Javid. Y A, Iqbal. R (2010). Corporate Governance in Pakistan: Corporate Valuation, Ownership and Financing: PIDE working paper 2010:57
  21. Jensen MC (1986). ―Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers.‖ Am. Econ. Rev., 76: 323-329
  22. Jensen MC (1993). ―The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems.‖ J. Fin., 48: 831-880
  23. Jensen MC, WH Meckling (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure, J. Finan. Econ., 2:305-360.
  24. Khalil Ahmed, Shortcomings in Corporate Governance Code—II, THE BUSINESS RECORDER, Sept. 8, 2004, at 19.
  25. Khanna M, Lisa D (1999). ―EPA’s Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms,‖ J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 37(1): 1-25.
  26. Khanna M, Wilma RQ, Dora B (1998). ―Toxics Release Information: A Policy Tool for Environmental Protection,‖ J. Environ. Econ. Mgt., 36: 243-266.
  27. Kim D, Hubbard G, Palia D (2004). The endogenous impact of leverage on firm value, working paper, Rutgers University and Columbia University.
  28. Klapper LF, Inessa L (2002). ―Corporate Governance, Investor Protection and Performance in Emerging Markets.‖ Social Science Research Network Working Paper No. 303979.
  29. Klein A (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure, J. Law Econ., 41: 275-303.
  30. Klein A (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics and earnings management, J. Account. Econ., 33: 375- 400.
  31. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny (2000) Investor Protection and Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58, 3–27.
  32. Liang N, Joanne L (1999). ―Board Structure and Firm Performance: New Evidence from China’s Private Firms‖, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Chicago, USA, August 7- 10.
  33. Mak Y, Kusnadi Y (2005). Size really matters: further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value, Pacific-Basin Finan. J., 13: 301-318.
  34. Mallette P, Fowler KL (1992). ―Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of "poison pills." Academy Manage. J., 35: 1010-1035.
  35. Miyajima H, Omi Y, Saito N (2003). Corporate governance and firm performance in twentieth century Japan, Business and Economic History. 1: 1-36.
  36. Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1988). ―Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis.‖ J. Fin. Econ., 20: 293-315.
  37. Palia D (2001). The endogeniety of managerial compensation in firm value: a solution, Rev. Finan. Stud., 14: 735-764.
  38. Pankaj J (1996). ―Managing credit for the rural poor: Lessons from the grameen bank.‖ World Development, 24(1): pp 79-89.
  39. Roe M (2002). ―Some Differences in Company Structure in Germany, Japan and the United States‖. Yale Law J., 102(7): 1927-2003.
  40. Sanda AU, Mikailu AS, Garba T (2005). ―Corporate governance mechanisms and firm financial performance in Nigeria‖, AERC Research Paper 149.
  41. Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997). A survey of corporate governance, J. Finan. Econ., 52(2): 737-783.
  42. Singh A, Singh A, Weisse B (2002). ―Corporate Governance, Competition, the New International Financial Architecture and Larger Corporations in Emerging Markets.‖ Working Paper No. 250, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, UK.
  43. Weir C, Laing D (1999). ―The Governance- Performance Relationship: The Effects of Cadbury Compliance on UK Quoted Companies.‖ European Accounting Association Conference, Bordeaux.
  44. Weisbach M (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover, J. Finan. Econ., 20: 431- 460.
  45. Williamson OE (1988) ―Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance‖, J. Finan., 43: 567-591.
  46. Yermack D (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors, J. Finan. Econ., 40: pp 185-211.
  47. Yuanto K (2003). ―Board Size Really Matters: Further Evidence on the Negative Relationship between Board Size and Firm Value‖, Pulses by Singapore Stock Exchange.
  48. Zingales L (1998). ―Corporate Governance.‖ The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. London: Macmillan.

Cite this Article: