Fraudulent Reporting Practices: The Inside Story of India’s Enron


Dr. Madan Lal Bhasin ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 33-46 | Views: 362 | Downloads: 99 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3466156

Volume 5 - October 2016 (10)


Fraudulent reporting practices can have significant consequences for organizations and all stakeholders, as well as, for public confidence in the capital and security markets. In fact, comprehensive, accurate and reliable financial reporting is the bedrock upon which our markets are based. Keen to project a rosy picture of the Satyam to investors, employees and analysts, Mr. Raju (CEO and Chairman) fudged the account books so that it appeared to be a far bigger enterprise, with high profits and fast growth rate, than it actually was. The Satyam fraud, India’s Enron, has shattered the dreams of different categories of investors, shocked the government and regulators alike, and led to questioning of the accounting practices of statutory auditors and corporate governance norms in India. This is an exploratory and qualitative study based on secondary sources of information. An attempt has been made to provide an explanation for various intriguing questions about Satyam scam. After thorough investigations by the CBI and SEBI, they have unveiled the methodology by which Satyam fraud was engineered. Finally, we recommend “Fraudulent reporting practices should be considered as a serious crime, and accounting bodies, courts and other regulatory authorities in India need to adopt very strict punitive measures to stop such unethical practices.” 


Fraudulent practices, financial reporting, inside story, India’s Enron, Satyam computer, modus-operandi, financial statements, corporate governance, auditors, forensic accounting, corporate culture and ethics, SEBI, SFIO, CID, India. 


  1. Agrawal, S. & Sharma, R. (2009). Beat this: Satyam won awards for corporate governance. Internal Audit. Available at
  2. ACFE (2016). Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse: Global Fraud Study. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. Available at
  3. Bhasin, M.L. (2007). Forensic Accounting: A New Paradigm for Niche Consulting. The Chartered Accountant, Jan., 1000-1010.
  4. Bhasin, M.L. (2008). Corporate Governance and Role of the Forensic Accountant. The Chartered Secretary. 38(10), Oct., 1361-1368.
  5. Bhasin, M.L. (2010). Corporate Governance Disclosure Practices: The Portrait of a Developing Country. International Journal of Business and Management. 5(4), April, 150-167.
  6. Bhasin, M.L. (2011). Corporate Governance Disclosure Practices: The Portrait of a Developing Country. International Review of Business Research Papers. 7(1), Jan., 393-419.
  7. Bhasin, M.L. (2012). Corporate Accounting Frauds: A Case Study of Satyam Computers Limited. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies. Oct., 3(10), 16-42.
  8. Bhasin, M.L. (2012a). Audit Committee Mechanism to Improve Corporate Governance: Evidence from a Developing Country. Modern Economy. 3(11), Nov. 856-72.
  9. Bhasin, M.L. (2013). Corporate Accounting Scandal at Satyam: A Case Study of India‟s Enron. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences. 1(12), March, 25-47.
  10. Bhasin, M.L. (2013a). Corporate Accounting Fraud: A Case Study of Satyam Computer Limited. Open Journal of Accounting. April, 2(2), 26-38.
  11. Bhasin, M.L. (2013b). Corporate Governance and Role of the Forensic Accountant: An Exploratory Study of an Asian Country. Amity Business Review. 14(1), Jan-June, 48-71.
  12. Bhasin, M.L. (2015). Forensic Accounting: Perspectives and Prospects. Pakistan Accountant. Oct.-Dec., pp. 44-48.
  13. Bhasin, M.L. (2015a). Menace of Frauds in Banking Industry: Experience of a Developing Country. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research. 4(12), April, 21-33.
  14. Bhasin, M.L. (2015b). Creative Accounting Practices in the Indian Corporate Sector: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Management Science and Business Research. 4(10), 35-52.
  15. Bhasin, M.L. (2016). Debacle of Satyam Computers Limited: A Case Study of India‟s Enron. Wulfenia Journal KLAGENFURT. 23(3), March, 124-162.
  16. Bhasin, M. L. (2016a). Survey of Creative Accounting Practices: An Empirical Study. Wulfenia Journal KLAGENFURT. 23(1), Jan., 143-162.
  17. Bhasin, M.L. (2016b). Unethical Creative Accounting Culture at Satyam Computers Limited: A Case Study of India‟s Enron. International Journal of Business and Social Research. 6(7), 24-48.
  18. Bhasin, M.L. (2016c). Strengthening Corporate Governance through an Audit Committee: An Empirical Study. Wulfenia Journal. 23(2), Feb., 2-27.
  19. Bhasin, M.L. (2016d). Contribution of Forensic Accounting to Corporate Governance: An Exploratory Study of an Asian Country. International Business Management. 10(4), 479-492.
  20. Chopra, A. (2011). Satyam fraud, not an accounting failure. Business Standard. 25 January. Available at
  21. Gupta, P.K. & Gupta, S. () Corporate frauds in India: Perceptions and emerging issues. Journal of Financial Crime, 22(1):79-103.
  22. ICAI (2009). ICAI finds ex Satyam CFO, Price Waterhouse auditors guilty. www.outlook
  23. ICAI (2014). The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has imposed a life-time ban on four auditors, April 22.
  24. Ingram, K. (2015). India‟s Satyam Scandal: A Blessing in Disguise? 20 Dec. Recorder Press.
  25. Kaul, V. (2015). Satyam scam: Ramalinga Raju, the man who knew too much, gets 7 years in jail, April 10.
  26. Krishnan, A. (2014). Finally, the truth about Satyam, The Hindu Business Line, July 18.
  27. Miller, G.S. (2006). The press as a watchdog for accounting fraud, Journal of Accounting Research. 44(5), Dec., 1001- 1033.
  28. Pai, K. & Tolleson, T.D. (2015). India‟s Satyam Scandal: Evidence too Large to Indict Mindset of Accounting Regulators is a Global Phenomenon. Review of Business and Finance Studies. 6(2), 35-43.
  29. Ramana, K.V. (2009). 7,561 fake invoices=Rs.5,117 crore Sales. April 15, Daily News Analysis. Available at
  30. Ramachadran, S. (2009). Raju brings down Satyam, shakes India. Asia Times Online Ltd.
  31. Reurink, A. (2016). Financial Fraud: A Literature Review. Discussion Paper 16/5. May, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.
  32. SFIO (2009). SFIO Report published in the Pioneer. New Delhi, May 4, 2009, 10.
  33. Shirur, S. (2011). Tunneling vs. Agency Effect: A Case Study of Enron and Satyam. Vikalpa. 36(3), 9-20.
  34. Shubhashish (2015). All that you need to know about the Satyam Scam, DNA, April 9.
  35. Veena L. Brown, Brian E. Daugherty, & Julie S. Persellin (2014). Satyam Fraud: A Case Study of India‟s Enron. Issues in Accounting Education. August, 29(3), 419-442.
  36. Winkler, D. (2010). India‟s Satyam Accounting Scandal. Feb.1. Available online at Wharton (2009). Scandal at Satyam: Truth, Lies and Corporate Governance. Available at knowledge@wharton website.

Cite this Article: