Influence of Supply Chain Scalability on Performance of Distribution Firms in Kenya

Author(s)

Jeremiah Marita Ocharo , Dr. Noor Ismail Shale ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 31-39 | Views: 632 | Downloads: 162 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4990243

Volume 9 - October 2020 (10)

Abstract

the main aim of the study was to determine influence of supply chain scalability on performance of distribution firms in Kenya using descriptive research design. Descriptive research design is used to describe characteristics of a population or phenomenon being studied. The study population consisted of 145 employees from clearing and forwarding firms. The stratified random sampling technique was appropriate for the study to come up with the sample size, because the target population is heterogeneous or of mixed sectors referred to as stratum. The stratified technique ensured that each sector in the target population has an equal chance of being selected. Data was collected using questionnaire. The process of data analysis involved several stages each response was analyzed and their frequency tabulated quantitatively to present a more detailed interpretation. The research thus performed a multiple regressions analysis on primary data to estimate the beta values of factors and t-test to determine the significance of the coefficients at 95% confidence level. Based on the study findings, the study found that performance of distribution firms in Kenya is affected by supply chain agility and supply chain integration being the major factors that mostly affected performance of distribution firms in Kenya. Thus, the study concludes that supply chain agility and supply chain integration, as central components of a firm’s competitive strategy. The study recommended that in order to improve the supply chain performance, organizations can focus to implement either or all of supply chain integration modes.

Keywords

Supply Chain Agility, Supply Chain Integration, Supply Chain Scalability, Performance, Distribution Firms 

References

             i.            Awino, B. (2011). An empirical investigation of selected strategy variables on firm’s performance: A study of supply chain management in large private manufacturing firms in Kenya, Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 3(8), 228-236

      ii.            Bahinipati, B. K., and Deshmukh, S. G. (2012). Vertical collaboration in the semiconductor industry: A decision framework for supply chain relationships. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 62(2), 504-526.

    iii.            Baloyi, L. & Bekker, M. (2011). Causes of construction cost and time overruns: the 2010 FIFA world cup stadia in South Africa. Acta Structilia, 18(1):51-67

     iv.            Beers, C., and Zand, F. (2014). RandD cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292-312

       v.            Bernard K. Langat (2015) Factors Affecting Supply Chain Agility in Medical Health Sector (Case Study of Kenya Medical Supply): The International Journal of Business & Management Pg 66-83

     vi.            Dehghan, M., Dehghan, D., Sheikhrabori, A., Sadeghi, M., and Jalalian, M. (2013). Quality improvement in clinical documentation: does clinical governance work? Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 6, 441.

   vii.            Dung, L. T. (2012) factors affecting the collaboration in the supply chain of mechanical enterprises in Vietnam.Enterprises. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 16(4), 569-585.40(4), 550-560.

 viii.            Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A., & O'Loughlin, A. (2016). Understanding and Development of Supply Chain Agility and Flexibility: A Structured Literature Review. International Journal of Management Reviews,

     ix.            Gichuru, M., Iravo, M., & Arani, W. (2015). Collaborative Supply Chain Practices on Performance of Food and Beverages Companies: A Case Study of Del Monte Kenya Ltd. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(11).

       x.            Hitt, M.A. and Dacin, M.T. (2010). “Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449-467.

     xi.            Johnston, W. J., Khalil, S., Jain, M., and Cheng, J. M. S. (2012). Determinants of joint action in international channels of distribution: The moderating role of psychic distance. Journal of International Marketing, 20(3), 34-49.

   xii.            Kebo V., Staša P., Beneš F. and Švub J. ( 2013) RFID Technology in Logistics Processes. In Proceedings of the 13th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo-          Conference SGEM 2013, Albena, Bulgaria; ISBN: 978-954-91818-9-0

 xiii.            Manyega, V. B. (2015). Effects of Supplier Selection on Procurement Performance of Public Institutions: A Case Study of Kisii County. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(9).

 xiv.            Potter, A., Towill, D., & Christopher, M. (2015). Evolution of the migratory supply chain model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), 603-612.06-2015-0231

   xv.            Sriram, V. and Stump, R. (2012). "Information technology investments in purchasing: An empirical investigation of communications, relationships and performance outcomes," Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 32, No., pp. 41-55.

 xvi.            Tynjala, T. (2012). Validation in Supply Chain Decision Support Systems. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 39-58.

xvii.            Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., & Wong, C. W. (2011). The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations management, 29(6), 6

Cite this Article: