Enhancing Risk Management and Fraud Detection in the U.S. Financial Industry Through Machine Learning Algorithms: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
Author(s)
Download Full PDF Pages: 07-19 | Views: 17 | Downloads: 3 | DOI:
Abstract
The U.S. financial industry is a bulwark of the global economy; hitherto, it faces unprecedented challenges from rapidly emerging risk factors and growing sophistication of fraud schemes. From identity theft to account takeovers to big-money money laundering, financial crimes perpetrated today have increased in frequency and complexity, costing billions annually and eroding public confidence in financial systems. Conventional fraud management frameworks and much of the fraud detection toolkit have their limitations in addressing fast evolving and dynamic threats because they are often based on static rule and/or historical patterns. As a result, ML has revolutionized risk management by bringing excellent processing power of massive datasets to bear interspersed with uncovering hidden correlations and adapting detection in real time. The discussion entails ML application into the risk management and fraud detection processes of the U.S. financial sector and it lays bare the potentialities and limitations in doing so.
While the researcher(Author) reviews various ML applications, from abnormality detection models indicating unusual transactions to predictive analytics systems assessing credit and market risk with more accuracy than conventional models, these are followed by giving special consideration to real-world case studies of systems developed and applied by institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Mastercard, and PayPal, focusing on the use of ML to minimize false positives and increase speed of detection. Besides, challenges abound in the practical adoption of ML. Such challenges include regulatory requirements, data privacy concerns, algorithmic bias, high implementation costs, and the “black box” effect of some complex models. Future directions are then put into view, including Explainable AI, federated learning, hybrid detection systems, and stronger governance frameworks. The article concludes that while it might not be panacea, ML is a good instrument for enhancing resiliency, building fraud defenses, and preserving that confidence on which the U.S. financial industry heavily relies.
Keywords
Machine Learning, Fraud Detection, Risk Management, U.S. Financial Industry, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Predictive Analytics.
References
1. Baesens, B., Van Vlasselaer, V., & Verbeke, W. (2015). Fraud analytics using descriptive, predictive, and social network techniques: A guide to data science for fraud detection. Wiley.
2. Brockett, P. L., & Levine, A. (2020). Predictive analytics in financial risk management: Applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence. North American Actuarial Journal, 24(4), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2020.1728392
3. Deloitte. (2022). AI in financial services: The road ahead. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/industry/financial-services/ai-in-financial-services.html
4. European Central Bank. (2021). Machine learning for fraud prevention in payments. ECB Occasional Paper Series No. 265. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op265~f9d79e5f3a.en.pdf
5. Federal Reserve. (2021). Supervisory insights on artificial intelligence in financial services. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://www.federalreserve.gov
7. Mastercard. (2021). Decision intelligence: Transforming fraud detection with AI. Mastercard Insights. https://www.mastercard.us
8. Olorunlana (2025). Harnessing Technology for Effective Fraud Detection: Tools, Trends, and Case Studies. Available from
9. PayPal. (2022). How PayPal fights fraud with real-time machine learning. PayPal Newsroom. https://newsroom.paypal-corp.com
10. Wells Fargo. (2022). Harnessing artificial intelligence for risk management. Wells Fargo Perspectives. https://stories.wf.com
11. Zhou, Y., Wang, X., & Li, J. (2021). Explainable AI in finance: Enhancing transparency and trust in risk management. Journal of Financial Technology, 3(2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2716557921500045
Cite this Article: