The Effects of Trade Openness on Economic Growth in The East African Community
Author(s)
Download Full PDF Pages: 10-38 | Views: 9 | Downloads: 3 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18619060
Abstract
This study explores the impact of trade liberalization on economic growth in the East African Community (EAC) member states, which include eight countries: Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, South Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and Somalia, over the period from 1990 to 2020. The East African Community (EAC) has been promoting regional economic integration through trade liberalization. Due to insufficient data for some countries, such as Burundi, South Sudan, Somalia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, this paper focuses on only four East African countries (EACs) and collects the necessary data: Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, and Rwanda. Understanding the relationship between trade openness and economic growth in these countries is critical to the formulation and advancement of policies that contribute to long-term economic growth in the region.
The first step of the mixed-methods analysis is to systematically evaluate the previous literature and then build a theoretical framework to understand the examples of economic growth driven by trade openness in developed and developing countries. The second step is to use data from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to explore the role of trade openness, foreign direct investment, aggregate capital formation, labor force participation ratios, and government spending in East Africa's economic growth using a fixed-panel data regression model.
The results of the analysis show some important conclusions, contrary to the theoretical view that trade openness always depends on market expansion, technology transfer, and increased competition to promote economic growth, and the study finds that there is a clear negative correlation between trade openness and economic growth in the EAC, which may be attributed to structural constraints in the region: heavy reliance on raw material exports, poor industrial base, unsustainable trade balances, and low export diversification, which limit the ability of EACC countries to take full advantage of global trade opportunities.
On the other hand, FDI has had a positive and statistically significant impact on the economic growth of the EAC countries of the East African Community, and FDI plays a key role in improving infrastructure, promoting the adoption of new technologies, creating jobs, and improving economic output and performance. These results are similar to the existing literature, which focuses on the importance of FDI and capital formation as a key driver of economic growth.
Although the relationship is not statistically significant, this is due to the widespread low-productivity agricultural activities in the region, the lack of formal jobs under government supervision, which also reduces the role of labor in economic growth, and government expenditure has a significant negative effect on economic growth, indicating that public expenditure is inefficient and public resources are misused. Problems of corruption, poor governance and overspending are particularly pronounced in areas that do not contribute to economic growth.
In the light of these findings, the study provides policy recommendations aimed at addressing the negative effects of trade openness and leveraging the positive effects of FDI and capital formation to promote sustained economic growth in the EACS sector. Governments need to consider policies and investment plans to diversify their economies through manufacturing, services, and technology investments that support high value-added industries and limit global commodity value shocks, as well as policies that promote employment in agriculture, textiles, and small-scale manufacturing, making economies more resilient and resilient to global shocks.
The study highlights the importance of improving infrastructure to facilitate and promote business and economic activity, and that investment in transportation, energy supply and digital infrastructure is critical to reducing transaction costs, enhancing the competitiveness of local manufacturing and integrating local firms into regional and global markets.
The study proposes to increase efforts to attract and effectively utilize FDI, and that EACC countries should adopt policies to create a favorable investment environment for investors, including maintaining economic stability, simplifying institutional regulations, and providing incentives to attract foreign investment, so that the benefits of FDI can be harnessed by creating more jobs, stimulating innovation, and diversifying their economies.
The study highlights the need to strengthen regional cooperation and promote trade among EAC countries, as well as efforts to standardize trade-related rules and regulations, reduce import tariffs, remove other barriers to trade, reduce and reduce customs processes, promote the free flow of goods and services between countries, and create value chains that allow finished goods at different stages to circulate throughout the region, which are key industries such as agriculture and manufacturing.
By identifying the challenges of reducing trade barriers, this study enhances the understanding of the relationship between trade liberalization and economic growth in the East African Community (EAC), and highlights the need to catalyse policy initiatives that address the underlying issues of economic fragility and maximize the benefits of trade liberalization to long-term economic growth.
Future studies should focus on the impact of trade liberalization on specific sectors, governance effectiveness, institutional standards, and the long-term economic outcomes of global shocks to EACC countries.
Keywords
Trade openness; Economic growth; East African Community
References
i. Ewards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity, and growth: What do we really know? Economic Journal, 108(447), 383-398.
ii. Rodriguez, F., & Rodrik, D. (2000). Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic's guide to the cross-national evidence. In B. S. Bernanke & K. Rogoff (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000 (pp. 261-338). MIT Press.
iii. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
iv. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
v. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
vi. Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions, trade, and growth in developing countries: A critique of the institutional view. Journal of Development Economics, 63(1), 1-17.
vii. Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379-399.
viii.Sakyi, D., Asafu-Adjaye, J., & Tetteh, E. K. (2012). Trade openness and economic growth in Africa: Evidence from panel data analysis. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 5(4), 282-296.
ix. Königer, J., & Busse, M. (2012). The impact of trade openness on economic growth in developing countries. World Economy, 35(5), 661-672.
x. Pigika-Balanika, V. (2008). The impact of trade openness on economic growth: Evidence from developing countries (Master’s thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam). pp. 1–32.
xi. Moyo, C., & Khobai, H. (2018). The impact of trade openness on economic growth in Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries: Evidence from ARDL and PMG models. Journal of Economic Studies, 45(4), 756–772.
xii. Harrison, A., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2009). Trade, foreign investment, and industrial policy for developing countries. In D. Rodrik & M. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 5, pp. 4039–4214). Elsevier.
xiii.Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: A cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 57–89.
xiv.Suleiman, A., & Suleiman, S. (2017). Trade liberalization and economic growth in East Africa. Journal of African Economies, 22(3), 201-220.
xv. Kim, D. H. (2011). Trade, growth and income. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 20(5), 677–709
xvi.Krueger, A. O. (1998). Why trade liberalization is good for growth. Economic Journal, 108(450), 1518-1528.
xvii. Subramanian, A., & Roy, D. (2001). Who can explain the Mauritian miracle: Meade, Romer, Sachs, or Rodrik? World Development, 29(6), 1037-1051.
xviii.Collier, P., & Gunning, J. W. (1999). Explaining African economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 64-111.
xix.Limão, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451-479.
xx. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 133-162.
xxi.Ndulu, B., O’Connell, S., Bates, R., Collier, P., & Soludo, C. (2007). The Political Economy of Economic Growth in Africa, 1960–2000. Cambridge University Press.
xxii. Bigsten, A., & Söderbom, M. (2006). What have we learned from a decade of manufacturing enterprise surveys in Africa? The World Bank Research Observer, 21(2), 241-265.
xxiii.Were, M. (2015). Differential effects of trade on economic growth and investment: A cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of African Economies, 20(2), 251-271.
xxiv.Bigsten, A., & Gebreeyesus, M. (2007). The small, the young, and the productive: Determinants of manufacturing firm growth in Ethiopia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(4), 813-840.
xxv. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Publishers.
xxvi.Ndikumana, L., & Nannyonjo, J. (2020). Investment in infrastructure and sustainable development in Africa. African Development Review, 32(4), 392-406.
xxvii. Fosu, A. K. (2021). Governance and growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: The role of institutional quality. Journal of African Economies, 15(S1), 45-74.
xxviii. Campos, N. F., & Kinoshita, Y. (2023). Foreign direct investment and economic growth: A survey of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 37(1), 1-36.
xxix.Javorcik, B. S. (2022). Does foreign direct investment foster technological spillovers? Journal of International Business Studies, 53(6), 987-1015.
xxx. Kose, M. A., & Ohnsorge, F. (2021). Trade and growth in the post-pandemic global economy. World Bank Economic Review, 34(S1), 1-22.
xxxi.McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2023). Structural change, trade openness, and productivity growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 25(4), 273-299.
xxxii. Monyela, M. N., & Saba, C. S. (2024). Trade openness, economic growth and economic development nexus in South Africa: A pre- and post-BRICS analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1108. https://doi.org/10.1057 /s41599-024-03604-2
xxxiii. Cheung, J., & Ljungqvist, Z. (2021). The impact of trade openness on economic growth: A panel data analysis across advanced OECD countries. Stockholm University Press. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1565943 /FULLTE-XT01
xxxiv. Ajayi, E. O., & Araoye, F. E. (2019). Trade openness and economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 4(2), 50–63.
xxxv. Capolupo, R., & Celi, G. (2009). Openness and economic growth: A comparative study of alternative trading regimes. Économie Internationale, 116(4), 5–35. https://doi.org /10.3917/ecoi.116.0005
Cite this Article: