A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of the Legislative Systems of the Peoples Republic of China and the Republic of Kenya
Author(s)
Saad Abdidahir Mouse , Sahal Adawe Abdille , Shafie Digale ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 01-11 | Views: 12 | Downloads: 2 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21969374
Abstract
this research report offers a comprehensive comparative analysis of the legislative systems of the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Kenya, focusing on academic and scholarly researches an extensive review of the provided search results reveals a striking scarcity of direct, peer-reviewed comparative studies on this specific topic. Despite indications of diplomatic exchanges and mutual interest in each other's governance systems the academic literature has yet to produce a substantial body of work that juxtaposes the National People’s Congress of China with the Parliament of Kenya.
Therefore, this report adopts a constructive comparative approach. It synthesizes country-specific information drawn from the available research to build a thematic comparison across several key dimensions: constitutional and political foundations, institutional structure, the law-making process and party influence, public participation and civil society engagement, legislative effectiveness and oversight, and the impact of digitalization and modernization. The central analytical framework contrasts China’s socialist political system, characterized by the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC), with Kenya’s multiparty democratic system, as defined by its transformative 2010 Constitution structure
The evidence clearly suggests that China and Kenya have not only different legislatures in form but are fundamentally different in purpose, functionality, and philosophy. While China's National People's Congress can best be described as “the highest organ of state power” in a highly centralized and unicameral arrangement that operates under the rubric of democratic centralism, its primary purpose of membership is to give effect to the policy program of the ruling party through legislation. The bicameral legislature of Kenya, on the other hand, operates on principles of separation of powers and multiparty politics and can best be described as an arena of politicking or a venue of democratic contestation of interests and oversight of an appointed or elected government. This report will exhaustively examine and detail all these differences based on evidence gathered
Keywords
Legislative systems; National People's Congress; Parliament of Kenya; comparative analysis; democratic centralism; multiparty democracy; constitutional foundations; bicameralism; unicameralism; law-making process; public participation; civil society; legislative oversight; digitalization; People's Republic of China; Republic of Kenya
References
[1] Chafetz, J. (2017). Congress's Constitution: Legislative authority and the separation of powers. Yale University Press.
[2] Ying, S. (2023). The National People's Congress in China. In Routledge Handbook of Asian Parliaments (pp. 143-157). Routledge.
[3] Liu, C., & Wang, K. (2022). Comparison of China's CPPCC and the UK House of Lords: Insights for the Construction of the CPPCC System. Hong Kong LJ, 52, 1111.
[4] O'brien, K. J. (2008). Reform without liberalization: China's National People's Congress and the politics of institutional change. Cambridge University Press.
[5] Dowdle, M. W. (1997). The constitutional development and operations of the National People's Congress. Colum. J. Asian L., 11, 1.
[6] Ochieng, W. K. (2021). Constitutional Guardianship in Kenya's Bicameral Legislature: An Assessment of Judicial Intervention in Inter-Cameral Disputes over the Enactment of the Division of Revenue Bill. Strathmore LJ, 5, 115.
[7] Imbo, V. W., & Kiruthu, F. (2019). Effects of public participation on legislation by the Kenya National Assembly. International Academic Journal of Law and Society, 1(2), 104-120.
[8] Proctor, J. H. (2011). The role of the Senate in the Kenya Political System.
[9] Lawrence, S. V., & Martin, M. F. (2013, March). Understanding China's political system.
[10] Hu, S. (1993). Representation without democratization: The “signature incident” and China's National People's Congress. The Journal of Contemporary China, 2(2), 3-34.
[11] Kanyinga, K. (2014). Kenya: Democracy and political participation.
[12] National People's Congress of China Zhongguo renda (Duiwai ban). (n.d.). [Print periodical]. ISSN 1674-3008.
[13] Babafemi, O., & Akinfaderin, A. (2020). Predicting and Analyzing Law-Making in Kenya. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05493.
[14] Feng, Y. (2019). The legislative decentralization in China in the reform era: Progress and Limitations.
[15] Ong’era, A., & Musili, M. (2019). Public sector reforms in Kenya: Challenges and Opportunities.
[16] Zhanshu, L. (2023). Report on the work of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress.
[17] Ogembo, B. (2022). Deliberative democracy in legislative committees: interpreting public deliberation in Kenya's subnational legislatures (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
[18] Jan, G. P. (1962). Minor Parties in Communist China. Current History, 43(253), 174-183.
[19] Elischer, S. (2008). Ethnic coalitions of convenience and commitment: Political parties and party systems in Kenya.
[20] Li, L., Tian, H., & Lv, Y. (Eds.). (2018). China's rule of law index 2017. Singapore: Springer.
[21] Jumanne, A. S. (2025). Public Participation Modalities and Framework: A Review of Legislative Processes.
[22] Spires, A. J. (2024). Global Civil Society and China.
[23] Yao, T. (2022). A Brief Analysis of the Post-Legislative Evaluation Mechanism and the Present Situation in China. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 19, 263–267.
[24] WANG, G. (n.d.). Thinking on including the npc in the supervision scope of the constitution. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-1751.2014.02.008
[25] Opiyo, R., Mwau, B., Mwang’a, K., & Mwaniki, D. (2017). Attaining E-Democracy Through Digital Platforms in Kenya (pp. 441–459). Springer, Singapore.
Cite this Article: