The Survival Analysis and Empirical Study of Innovation, Exposure and the Performance of Listed Companies in China

Author(s)

Nijun Zhang , Fengru Sun ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 110-114 | Views: 1148 | Downloads: 345 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3483471

Volume 7 - April 2018 (04)

Abstract

In the context of a right economic situation, consumers prefer the appearance and new features of their products. Therefore, companies that develop new features and products with new appearances will perform better. As China's GDP has grown for 27 years (1980-2017), with an average growth rate of 9.57, the number of enterprises in the same industry has increased, and the competitiveness has also increased. During the 12th five-year plan period (2010-2015), the number of enterprises in the country increased by 92.3%, and the annual growth rate of high-tech manufacturing enterprises was 7.1%. In this context, consumers are increasingly inclined to purchase stylish and innovative products. Also, because of the increase in the number of companies with similar products and the increased competition, companies with high positive exposure, which companies actively promote through various media, have performed better. This article takes Shenwan Industrial Group's listed domestic appliance companies as the research object. To exclude the impact of scale on the research sample, only companies with average total assets of less than RMB 3 billion from 2014 to 2016 are selected. The COX model was used to test whether the level of innovation and exposure had a significant positive impact on the company's survival performance, to encourage companies to invest more resources in the company's innovation and advertising marketing.

Keywords

Innovation, Exposure, COX Model, Survival Analysis, Household Appliance Industry

References

  1. Kadochnikov S, Fedyunina A. (2017). The impact of financial and human resources on the export performance of Russian firms. Economic Systems, 41.
  2. Newbert S L. ( 2007).  Empirical Research on the Resource-Based View of the Firm: An Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2):121-146.
  3. Armstrong, C. E., & Shimizu, K. (2007). A review of approaches to empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Official Journal of the Southern Management Association, 33(6), 959-986.
  4. Undata, “World GDP” Accessed March, 2018, http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=world+gdp&d=WDI&f=Indicator_Code%3aNY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG%3bCountry_Code%3aARB%2cWLD
  5. The re-gression-analog to survival analysis:Aselected application toturnover research. Morita J.G,Lee T.W,Mowday R.T. The Academy of Management Journal . 1993
  6. Peteraf MA. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 179–191.
  7. Helsen Kristiaan,Schmittlein David C. (1993). Analyzing Duration Times in Marketing:Evidence for the Effectiveness of Hazard Rate Models. Marketing Science.

Cite this Article: