Social Identity and the Transition to Entrepreneurship
Author(s)
Saba Fazal Firdousi , Prof Dr Cai Li , Majid Murad , Hasnain Javed ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 72-87 | Views: 951 | Downloads: 270 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3614729
Abstract
In the transition from employment to entrepreneurship, what part does social identity play? Social identity is supposed to shape the cognitive processes that underlie the development of entrepreneurial intentions, according to the theory of planned actions (TPB). In the TPB model, based on the attitudes of academic scientists to market research awareness, we examined social identity (the group association of scientists with their academic peers at work) as a moderator. In a group of 488 German researchers, our theories are tested. The data revealed that mood, social norms, and perceived control predicted entrepreneurial intentions and that perceived control was negatively correlated with group identity. Multi-group structural equation modeling also showed that the TPB-intention relation was moderated by group recognition. Low-group identification scientists based their entrepreneurial aspirations not so much on social norms and behaviors, but on their own initiative and confidence in power. In addition, entrepreneurial intentions were primarily a function of social norms among scientists with high group identification.In summary, these findings highlight the long-neglected dynamic significance for the transition to the entrepreneurship of identifying with and social cohesion within peer groups at the workplace.
Keywords
Entrepreneurial intentions, Academic entrepreneurship, Theory of planned behavior, Social identity, Opportunity recognition
References
i. Abrams, D., Ando, K. & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross- cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers’ turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10),1027-1039.
ii. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos 7.0 user's guide. Chicago: SPSS.
iii. Ajzen, I. (2002). Construction of a standard questionnaire for the theory of planned behavior.Retrieved June 10, 2008 from http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~aizen/
iv. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
v. Ajzen, I. & Madden, T.J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453-474.
vi. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105-123.
vii. Armitage, C.J. & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A metaanalytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 471-499.
viii. Audretsch, D.B. (2007). The entrepreneurial society. New York: Oxford University Press.
ix. Bercovitz, J. & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.
x. Bird, B. J. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453.
xi. Callero, P. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 203-215.
xii. Conner, M. & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for future research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429-1464.
xiii. Cook, C., Heath, F. & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821-836.
xiv. Elfenbein, D. W., Hamilton, B. H., & Zenger, T. R. (2010). The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawing of scientists and engineers. Management Science, 56(4), 659- 681.
xv. Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Luedemann, E. (in press). Identity and entrepreneurship: Do school peers shape entrepreneurial intentions? Small Business Economics.
xvi. Fayolle, A. (2005). Evaluation of entrepreneurship education: Behavior performing or intention increasing?. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2(1), 2005.
xvii. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (2005). Theory-based behavior change interventions: Comments on Hobbis and Sutton. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 27-31.
xviii. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Taylor.
xix. Garonne, C., Davidsson, P. (2010). Do strategy choices matter for nascent firms? Effectuation in the early stages of venture creation. 2010 Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 6–10 August 2010, Montreal.
xx. Gosling, S.D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S. & John, O.P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93-104.
xxi. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545-579.
xxii. Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academic's organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 821- 845.
xxiii. Gulbrandsen, M. (2005). “But Peter’s in it for the money” – The liminality of entrepreneurial scientists. VEST Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 18(1-2), 49-75.
xxiv. Hogg, M. H. & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
xxv. Hogg, M. A. & Hains, S. C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 323341.
xxvi. Hogg, M. A. & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
xxvii. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
xxviii. Kline, R.B. (2005). Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
xxix. Krueger, N. F. (2007). What lies beneath? The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 31(1), 123-138.
xxx. Krueger, N. F. & Brazeal, D.V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 18(3), 91-104.
xxxi. Krueger, N. F. & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial Intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5(4), 315-330.
xxxii. Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D. & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
xxxiii. Lechler, T. (2001). Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16, 263-278.
xxxiv. Lee, L., Wong, P. K., Foo, M. D. & Leung, A. (2009). Entrepreneurial intentions: The influence of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 124-136.
xxxv. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79−122.
xxxvi. Leskinen, R. (2011). Success in the female entrepreneurial networking process. Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, 2, 6002.
xxxvii. Markman, G. D., Balkin, D. B. & Baron, R. A. (2002). Inventors and new venture formation: The effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27(2), 149-165.
xxxviii. Mueller, S. L. & Thomas, A. S. (2000). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 51-75.
xxxix. Murray, F. & Graham, L. (2007). Buying science and selling science: Gender differences in the market for commercial science. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 657-689.
xl. Nanda, R. & Sørensen, J. B. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116-1126.
xli. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2006). The illusion of group productivity: A reduction of failures explanation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 31-48.
xlii. Norman, P., Clark, T., & Walker, G. (2005). The theory of planned behavior, descriptive norms, and the moderating role of group identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(5), 1008-1029.
xliii. Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K. & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (in press). Explaining entrepreneurial behavior: Dispositional personality traits, growth of personal entrepreneurial resources, and business idea generation. The Career Development Quarterly.
xliv. Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention as developmental outcome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 63-72.
xlv. OECD (2003). Turning science into business. Paris, France: OECD.
xlvi. Owen-Smith, J. & Powell, W. (2001). Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. Research in the Sociology of Work, 10, 109-140.
xlvii. Özcan, S. & Reichstein, T. (2009). Transition to entrepreneurship from the public sector: Predispositional and contextual effects. Management Science, 55(4), 604-618.
xlviii. Parker, S. C. (2009). Why do small firms produce the entrepreneurs? The Journal of Socio- Economics, 38, 484-494.
xlix. Rahm, D. (1994). Academic perceptions of university–firm technology transfer. Policy Studies Journal, 22, 267–278.
l. Rauch, A. & Frese, M. (2007). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
li. Reynolds, P.D. (1997). Who starts new firms? – Preliminary explorations of firms-ingestation. Small Business Economics, 9(5), 449-462.
lii. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243−263.
liii. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
liv. Shane, S.A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
lv. Shaver, K. G. & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 16(2), 23-45.
lvi. Silbereisen, R. K. (2002). Commentary: At last research on career development in a developmental-contextual fashion. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 310-319.
lvii. Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S. & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-591.
lviii. Statistisches Bundesamt (2008). Bildung und Kultur: Personal an Hochschulen [Education and culture: Personell at universities]. Statistisches Bundesamt, Germany.
lix. Stets J. E. & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.
lx. Stryker, S. (1987). Identity theory: Developments and extensions. In Yardley, K. & Honess, T. (eds.), Self and identity (pp. 89-104). New York: Wiley.
lxi. Stuart, T. E. & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.
lxii. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (eds.) The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
lxiii. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behavior: Selfidentity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225-244.
lxiv. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
lxv. Vondracek, F. W., Lerner, R. M. & Schulenberg, J. E. (1986). Career development: A lifespan developmental approach. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
lxvi. Zhao, H., Hills, G. E., & Seibert, S. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272.
Cite this Article: