Business Model innovation for Sustainability and Social Impact

Author(s)

Valerio Brescia , Paolo Pietro Biancone , Silvana Secinaro , Daniel Iannaci ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 30-40 | Views: 942 | Downloads: 277 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3613445

Volume 8 - November 2019 (11)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the cooperative social model that also involves food and beverage products can be considered a sustainable model.The authors studied the Italian social cooperative Arcobaleno of Turin, implementing the sustainable business model in the food industry with a specific focus on the human resources factor in the group context and focusing on some more relevant aspects concerning the consolidated statement of the financial statements.The study highlights social output; the market dimension and non-market dimension of the consolidated group provide a major in-depth study of the SROI model approach. It is based on accounting measures of production, based on the resources used, measurements of performance using indicators, according to the principles of cost-efficiency analysis (CEA) and the monetary valuation of production approach based on the cost-benefit analysis (CBA).The model and the analysis of social impact can have implications throughout Europe where social cooperatives are already widespread.The effect of this model has an effective impact on the overall economic system.The percentage of disadvantaged workers involved in the consolidated group allows for social allocation and better social reintegration.The analysis allows, also through practical evidence, to overcome the limits linked to the measurement of the innovative performance of social innovation in the food sector. The development and diffusion of social cooperatives with the elements highlighted in the analysis allow the development of sustainable models that consider the respect and the valorisation of human resources.

Keywords

food industry, sustainability, business model innovation, social cooperative, social impact, consolidated group.

References

i.        Altopiedi, R., & DI MONACO, R. (2010). Dalla tossicodipendenza al lavoro. La storia, il modello. Le proposte. Intorno all’esperienza della cooperativa Arcobaleno. ANIMAZIONE SOCIALE, 247, 13–24.

ii.      Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Eads, G. C., Hahn, R. W., Lave, L. B., Noll, R. G., … Smith, V. K. (1997). Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? Environment and Development Economics, 2(2), 195–221.

iii.    Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., & Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 25.

iv.     Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2012). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Revista de Administração, 47(3), 370–384.

v.       Biancone, P., Secinaro, S., & Brescia, V. (2016). The Popular Financial Reporting: Focus on Stakeholders—The first European Experience. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(11), 115–125.

vi.     Biancone, P., Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., & Iannaci, D. (2018). The Popular financial reporting as tool to measure social impact. 14TH INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON INTANGIBLES AND IN℡LECTUAL CAPITAL VALUE CREATION, INTEGRATED REPORTING AND GOVERNANCE, 1–48.

vii.   Boccia, F., & Sarno, V. (2019). Socially responsible food behavior: Perspectives from empirical evaluations. Food Research International, 121, 91–96.

viii. Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2004). The emergence of social enterprise (Vol. 4). Psychology Press.

ix.     Borzaga, C., Depedri, S., & Tortia, E. (s.d.). THE ROLE OF COOPERATIVE AND SOCIAL ENTERPRISES: A MULTIFACETED APPROACH FOR AN ECONOMIC PLURALISM.

x.       Bresciani, S. (2017). Open, networked and dynamic innovation in the food and beverage industry. British Food Journal, 119(11), 2290–2293.

xi.     Campbell, D. T. (1986). Relabeling internal and external validity for applied social scientists. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(31), 67–77.

xii.   Certo, S. T., & Miller, T. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts. Business horizons, 51(4), 267–271.

xiii. Civera, C., De Colle, S., & Casalegno, C. (2019). Stakeholder engagement through empowerment: The case of coffee farmers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(2), 156–174.

xiv. Corazza, L., & Cisi, M. (2012). Accountability challenges in social enterprise and the implementation of a reporting standard: An Italian case study. Journal of Social Business, 2, 44–67.

xv.   Cummins, E., Hospido, A., & Van Impe, J. F. (2019). Quantitative tools for sustainable food and energy in the food chain. Food Res Int, 115, 126–127.

xvi. Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit management and leadership, 14(4), 411–424.

xvii.           Dees, J. G. (2017). 1 The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. In Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (pagg. 34–42). Routledge.

xviii.         Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of social entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53.

xix. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. (2015). A map of social enterprises and their eco-systems in Europe. Presentato al London. https://doi.org/10.2767/458972

xx.   Docherty, P., Kira, M., & Shani, A. R. (2008). Creating sustainable work systems: Developing social sustainability. Routledge.

xxi. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental quality management, 8(1), 37–51.

xxii.           Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42.

xxiii.         Epstein, M. J., & Freedman, M. (1994). Social disclosure and the individual investor. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(4), 94–109.

xxiv.          Foran, B., Lenzen, M., & Dey, C. (2005). Balancing act: A triple bottom line analysis of the Australian economy.

xxv.            Franceschelli, M. V., Santoro, G., & Candelo, E. (2018). Business model innovation for sustainability: A food start-up case study. British Food Journal, 120(10), 2483–2494.

xxvi.          Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California management review, 25(3), 88–106.

xxvii.        Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of management review, 24(2), 191–205.

xxviii.      Fuguitt, D., & Wilcox, S. J. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis for public sector decision makers. Greenwood Publishing Group.

xxix.          Garcia-Blandon, J., Argilés-Bosch, J. M., Martinez-Blasco, M., & Merino, D. C. (2018, marzo 21). On the relationship between compliance with recommendations on the audit committee of codes of good practices and financial reporting quality. Journal of Management and Governance, pagg. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9412-1

xxx.            Güth, W. (1995). An evolutionary approach to explaining cooperative behavior by reciprocal incentives. International Journal of Game Theory, 24(4), 323–344.

xxxi.          Hendricks, M., Plantz, M. C., & Pritchard, K. J. (2008). Measuring outcomes of United Way–funded programs: Expectations and reality. New Directions for Evaluation, 2008(119), 13–35.

xxxii.        Holländer, H. (1990). A social exchange approach to voluntary cooperation. The American Economic Review, 1157–1167.

xxxiii.      Infante, C. E. D. de C., de Mendonça, F. M., Purcidonio, P. M., & Valle, R. (2013). Triple bottom line analysis of oil and gas industry with multicriteria decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 289–300.

xxxiv.      Irene, B., Marika, A., Giovanni, A., & Mario, C. (2016). Indicators and metrics for social business: A review of current approaches. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1–24.

xxxv.        Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2014). Blue ocean strategy, expanded edition: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard business review Press.

xxxvi.      Kline, C., Shah, N., & Rubright, H. (2014). Applying the positive theory of social entrepreneurship to understand food entrepreneurs and their operations. Tourism Planning & Development, 11(3), 330–342.

xxxvii.    Krlev, G., Münscher, R., & Mülbert, K. (2013). Social Return on Investment (SROI): State-of-the-art and perspectives-a meta-analysis of practice in Social Return on Investment (SROI) studies published 2002-2012.

xxxviii.  Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization science, 1(3), 248–266.

xxxix.      Ma, U. (2018). Do More with Less: A Guide for Uncertain Times. New York: Routledge.

xl.     Manning, L., & Mei Soon, J. (2013). GAP framework for fresh produce supply. British Food Journal, 115(6), 796–820.

xli.   Murphy, K. S. (2007). A proposed framework for measuring human capital intangible value component in restaurant organizations using Economic Value Added. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 10(3), 3–23.

xlii. Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (2012). The nature of social innovation. In Social innovation (pagg. 1–30). Springer.

xliii.           Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200414211

xliv.           Okpara, J. O., & Halkias, D. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: An overview of its theoretical evolution and proposed research model. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 1(1), 4–20.

xlv. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.

xlvi.           Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1.

xlvii.         Porquier, G., Luciano, A., & DI MONACO, R. (2010). Dalla tossicodipendenza al lavoro. Intorno all’esperienza della cooperativa Arcobaleno. ANIMAZIONE SOCIALE, 247, 1–61.

xlviii.       Salzberg, A. C., Gough, M. Z., & Suen, I.-S. (2019). Sustainable innovation behavior in restaurants. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 22(2), 167–190.

xlix.           Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of business ethics, 111(3), 335–351.

l.        Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business horizons, 48(3), 241–246.

li.      Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications Limited.

lii.    Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work. Indiana business review, 86(1), 4–8.

liii.  Smith, K. B. (2018). The public policy theory primer. Routledge.

liv.   Spano, A. (2009). Public Value Creation and Management Control Systems. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 328–348.

lv.     Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

lvi.   Steinberg, R., & Gray, B. H. (1993). « The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise» in 1993: Hansmann Revisited. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(4), 297–316.

lvii. Stokes, D. P., Moore, D. N., Brooks, D. S., Wells, P. C., & Jessica. (2013). Sustainable and responsible business: Focal cases, sectors and contexts. EuroMed Journal of Business, 8(3).

lviii.           Strand, R., & Freeman, R. E. (2015). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of business ethics, 127(1), 65–85.

lix.   Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & environment, 21(2), 103–127.

lx.     Valerio Brescia. (2019). The popular financial reporting: New accounting tool for Italian municipalities. Milano: Franco Angeli.

lxi.   Weber, J., & Marley, K. A. (2012). In search of stakeholder salience: Exploring corporate social and sustainability reports. Business & society, 51(4), 626–649.

lxii. Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247–261.

lxiii.           Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of world business, 41(1), 21–35.

lxiv.           Werther Jr, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2010). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. Sage.

lxv. Wiedmann, T., & Lenzen, M. (2008). Unravelling the impacts of supply chains—A new triple-bottom-line accounting approach and software tool. In Environmental management accounting for cleaner production (pagg. 65–90). Springer.

lxvi.           Wood, R., & Garnett, S. (2010). Regional sustainability in Northern Australia—A quantitative assessment of social, economic and environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1877–1882.

lxvii.         Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge, 3(1), 97–114.

lxviii.       Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.

Cite this Article: