Post- Bureaucracy and Post-bureaucratic Culture in Public Administration.

Author(s)

Dr. Alper ÖZMEN ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 75-81 | Views: 870 | Downloads: 120 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3405767

Volume 2 - March 2013 (03)

Abstract

Post- bureaucratic culture refers to informal inter-personal relationships by reducing chain of command and formal relationships by means of paying attention to the subordinate’s decisions and preferences thereby keeping spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship. This pattern, foresees public administrators as acting strategically by taking initiative, reflecting an understanding which is trying to remove the distance between itself and environment and appreciating flexibility, open systems and more effective use of social capital. Dynamic use of information and shining out of informationbased power relationships are basic factors of this philosophy. This paper, aims to examine the concepts of post-bureaucracy and post- bureaucratic culture that rises in today’s world in which the inflexibilities overcame and new organization models occurred in public administration.

Keywords

Public Management, Post-Bureaucracy, Bureaucratic Culture, Post-Bureaucratic Culture, Transformation.

References

                    i.            Ateş, Hamza (2008), “Postbürokratik Kamu Yönetimi”, Kamu Yönetiminde Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar, Ed. A. Balcı, A. Nohutçu, N. K. Öztürk, B. Coşkun, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, ss. 83-106.

       ii.            Davidow, William H. and Michael Shawn Malone (1992), The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century, HarperBusiness, NewYork.

      iii.            Hopfl, Harro M. (2006), “PostBureaucracy and Weber’s ‘modern’ Bureaucrat”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 8-21.

     iv.            Grey, Chris and Christina Garsten (2001), “Trust, Control and Post-bureaucracy”, Organization Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 229-250.

       v.            Leidner, Dorothy, Mayam Alavi, Timothy Kayworth (2006), “The Role of Culture in Knowledge Management: A Case Study of Two Global Firms”, International Journal of e-Collaboration, Vol. 2, Is. 1, pp. 17-40.

     vi.            Maravelias, Christian and Johan Hansson (2005), “Freedom in the Age of Postbureaucracy: The Example of Strategic Occupational Health”, International Critical Management Studies Conference, 4-6 July 2005, Judge Institute of Management, University of Cambridge, UK., pp. 1-14.

    vii.            Moisander, Johanna and Sari Stenfors (2009), “Exploring the Edges of TheoryPractice Gap: Epistemic Cultures in Strategy-Tool Development and Use”, Organization, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 227-247.

  viii.            Parker, Rachel and Lisa Bradley (2004), “Bureaucracy or Post-Bureaucracy? Public Sector Organisations in a Changing Context”, The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 26, No. 2, (December 2004), pp. 197-215.

     ix.            Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre (2007), “Introduction: The Role of Public Administration in Governing”, Ed. G. Peters and J. Pierre, Handbook of Public Administration, Sage Publications, London.

       x.            Powell, Walter W. (1990), “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network forms of Organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, pp. 295-336.

     xi.            Rice, Mitchell (2004), “Organizational Culture, Social Equity, and Diversity: Teaching Public Administration Education in the Postmodern Era”, Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol. 2, pp. 143-154.

    xii.            Schein Edgar H. (2009), The Corporate Culture Survival Guide, New and Revised Edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

  xiii.            Scott Morton, S. (Ed.) (1991), The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  xiv.            Sinha, Smrita, Ajay Kr. Singh, Nisha Gupta, Rajul Dutt (2010), “Impact Of Work Culture On Motıvatıon Level Of Employees In Selected Publıc Sector Companıes In Indıa”, Delhi Business Review, Vol. 11, No. 1 (January - June 2010), pp. 43-54.

   xv.            Vinelli, Andres G. (1999), Bureaucracy and Post Bureaucracy at the Same Time: Towards an Agenda for Argentine Public Management, Harvard University and Centro de para el Desarrollo Institıcional, http://cdi.mecon.gov.ar/biblio/docelec/cedi /dt19.pdf, e.t.: 05.01.2012.

Cite this Article: