Academic Education, as Seen by Students

Author(s)

dr. Daniela Andron ,

Download Full PDF Pages: | Views: 373 | Downloads: 104 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3446046

Volume 2 - October 2013 (10)

Abstract

The main issues considered by the research are referring to the general context of the academic education and the Romanian higher education system, aiming to identify deficiencies of the system, criteria for selecting the University that provides most adequate knowledge and competence for graduates and understanding of the directions for a careeroriented educational system, at the present as well as for the next future, identifying needs for a better career-oriented instructional system. The paper also aims to identify whether the educational system and particularly university studies meet the needs of students of economical sciences faculty for professional insertion. The study searched for opinions expressed by students and by their professors in order to formulate solutions that might improve teaching processes at this level. 

Keywords

instructional needs, knowledge, competence, professional insertion.

References

  1. T. Andrei, D. Teodorescu, B. Oancea, “Evolution of higher education in Romania during the transition period,” WCLTA 2010, in Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences , 9 (2010), pp. 963–967
  2. E. de Bono, "De Bono's Thinking Course: Powerful Tools to Transform Your Thinking". Curtea Veche Publishing, Bucharest, 2007, pp. 1-3
  3. J. Delaney, A. Johnson, et al., (2010, Dec.) The Students' Perception of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, University of Wisconsin Extension [Online]. Available: http://www.uwex.edu Accessed: 2012/12/22
  4. S. Garben., (2012, Sep.). The Future of Higher Education in Europe:The Case for a Stronger Base in EU Law. LEQS Paper [Online]. 50/2012. Available: http://bit.ly/QF1rCd
  5. A. Marga., (2009). Crisis and after crisis. Eikon, Cluj-Napoca, 2009, pp.118-121
  6. L. Moraru, "The Romanian Modern University in the Frame of the Academic Profession and Governance", ICEEPSY 2012, in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 69(2012), pp. 79 – 88

Cite this Article: