Impact Of Workload And Inflexible Organizational Environment On The Employee Turnover In Private Sector Of Pakistan.



iftikhar ahmed , Mrs.Naveeda Zeb ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 12-19 | Views: 344 | Downloads: 111 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3463808

Volume 5 - January 2016 (01)


Changing business environment with ever rising competition has marked to the incredible changes in the organizational structure with shedding limelight on the importance of building effective work place environment in order to achieve better performance in terms of efficiency, productivity and higher outcomes. However, rising competition has compelled to the organizations to integrate inflexible working environment and put extra workload on employees to reduce cost of operations. This research is aimed to investigate impact of workload and inflexible work environment on inclination of turnover among employees. The data gathering process was undertaken around a selected number of respondents from private banking sector of Pakistan. To put the work at wider context, the survey approach was applied with the help of a structured questionnaire comprising a wide range of close-ended questions. To ensure more and more reliability and validity of the research findings, four leading banks - United Bank Limited, Habib Bank Limited, Allied Bank Limited and Askari Bank Limited were selected. Analysis of the data was undertaken through application of various tests such as correlation and regression on SPSS. The findings of the research revealed that rising work load and complexity of work environment is generating dissatisfaction among employees, and consequently there is general trend among them to leave banking sector in search of better organizations. 


Workload, Job Stress, Inflexible Organizational Environment, Employee Turnover, Banking Sector, Pakistan 


  1. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. (2006). Organizational Identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
  2. Barth, R., Daniel, E., & Tara, N. (2009). Commercial banking structure, regulation, and performance, an international comparison. Comptroller of the Currency Economics Working Paper, 97-98.
  3. Belás, & Jaroslav. (2012). Social responsibility and ethics in the banking business: Myth or reality A case study from the Slovak Republic. Economic annals 57.195, 115-137.
  4. Brayfield, Arthur , H., Walter, H., & Crockett. (2005). Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological bulletin 52.5, 396.
  5. Chen, Shun, & Hsing. (2010). The development of an employee satisfaction model for higher education. The TQM Magazine 18.5, 484-500.
  6. Cropanzano, R., Howes, J., & Grandey, A. (2007). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior vol 18, 159–80.
  7. Cummings, & Thomas, G. (2009). Organization Development and Change. South Western: 9th Edition (ed.).
  8. De , C., & Einar , M. (2002). Job stress, fatigue, and job dissatisfaction in Dutch lorry drivers towards an occupation specific model of job demands and control. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 59.6, 356-361.
  9. Egan, Toby , M., Baiyin , Y., & Kenneth , R. (2004). The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human resource development quarterly 15.3, 279-301.
  10. Griffeth, Rodger , W., Peter , W., & Stefan , G. (2009). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of management 26.3, 463-488.
  11. Gummadi, & Krishna , P. (2010). Measurement, modeling, and analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. Vol. 37. No. 5.
  12. Halbesleben, Jonathon , R., & Ronald , B. (2004). Burnout in organizational life. Journal of management, 859-879.
  13. Hussain , T., & Asif. (2012). Is employees’ turnover intention driven by organizational commitment and perceived organizational support. Journal of quality and technology management 8.2, 1-10.
  14. Matsushima, R., & Shiomi, K. (2003). Social self-efficacy and interpersonal stress in adolescence. Social Behavior and Personality an International Journal. 31, 4, 323-332.
  15. Mobley, & William , H. (2005). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological bulletin 86.3, 493.
  16. Nielsen, & Karina. (2009). The mediating effects of team and self-efficacy on the relationship between transformational leadership, and job satisfaction and psychological well-being in healthcare professionals A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International journal of nursing studies 46.9, 1236-1244.
  17. Noe, Raymond , A., Steffanie , L., & Wilk. (2005). Investigation of the factors that influence employees' participation in development activities. Journal of applied psychology 78.2, 291.
  18. Porter, Lyman, W., & Richard, M. S. (2011). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological bulletin 80.2, 151.
  19. Sexton, & R.S. (2005). Employee turnover. a neural network solution Computers & Operations Research, 2635-2651.
  20. Spector , P., Chen , P., & Connell , B. (2000). A longitudinal study of relations between job stressors and job strains while controlling for prior negative affectivity and strains. Journal of Psychologicaly 85, 211–18.
  21. Thomas, G. C., & Christoper, G. W. (2007). Theory of organization development and change. Southern California.
  22. Wickens, & Christopher , D. (2012). Processing Resources in Attention, Dual Task Performance, and Workload. Assessment. No. EPL-81-3/ONR-81-3.

Cite this Article: