Influence of System Behavior on Success of Public Infrastructural Megaprojects in Kenya

Author(s)

Austin Baraza Omonyo , Prof. Roselyn Gakure , Prof. Romanus Odhiambo ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 11-26 | Views: 1412 | Downloads: 433 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3483409

Volume 7 - March 2018 (03)

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to investigate the influence of system behavior on the success of public infrastructural megaprojects in Kenya. The need for this study arose from the thesis that complexity is the main cause of waste and failure that results in infrastructural megaprojects being delivered over budget, behind schedule, with benefit shortfalls, over and over again; and that system behavior is a key cause of this complexity. The study was designed as quantitative research, based on virtual constructionist ontology. A cross-sectional census survey of completed public infrastructural megaprojects was conducted using two interlinked questionnaires. Data analysis was conducted using both descriptive and inferential statistics. The results showed that system behavior had a significant negative influence on the success of public infrastructural megaprojects. System dynamics arising from the interaction of connectedness and dependency influenced success in such a way that the relative variability in cost and schedule performance was lower in cases where project components were pre-fabricated, pre-assembled and tested offsite; and projects in which materials were only brought on site when the site was ready to receive them recorded superior performance in both cost and schedule. As such, this study recommends that the design of these projects should provide for a delivery model in which project components are pre-fabricated, pre-assembled and tested offsite before their actual use on the project. It is also recommended that procurement practices for these projects be streamlined to allow for Just-In-Time (JIT) procurement

Keywords

System behavior, megaproject, complexity, project success

References

       i.        Ahiaga-Dagbui, D.D., Love, P.E.D., Smith, S.D., & Ackermann, F. (2017). Toward a Systemic View to Cost Overrun Causation in Infrastructure Projects: A Review and            Implications for Research. Project Management Journal, 48(2), 88-98.

ii.      Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it is time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342.

iii.    Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O., & Weber, T.J. (2009). Leadership: Concurrent theories, research and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 421-449.

iv.     Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method of defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25-32.

v.       Bannermann, P.L. (2008). Defining project success: A multilevel framework. In      Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference (pp. 1-14). Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

vi.     Brady, T., & Davies, A. (2014). Managing Structural and Dynamic Complexity: A Tale of Two Projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 21-38.

vii.   Bruzelius, N., Flyvbjerg, B., Rothengatter, W. (2002). Big decision, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects. Transport Policy, 9(2), 143–154.

viii. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods (2nded.). New York, United       States: Oxford University Press Inc., p. 55.

ix.     Caldart, A. A., & Joan, E. R., (2004). Corporate Strategy Revisited: A View from    Complexity Theory. European Management Review, 1(1).

x.       Collyer, S. (2016). Culture, Communication, and Leadership for Projects in Dynamic Environments. Project Management Journal, 47(6), 111–125.

xi.     Connelly, L. M. (2008). Pilot studies. Medsurg Nursing, 17(6), 411-412.

xii.   Cooke-Davis, T. (2011). Complexity in Project Management and the Management of Complex Projects. In T. Cooke-Davis, L. Crawford, & C. Stevens (Eds.), Aspects of   Complexity: Managing projects in a complex world (pp 1-13). Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.

xiii. Cooke-Davies, T., Crawford, L., & Stevens, C. (Eds.). (2011). Aspects of Complexity: Managing projects in a complex world. Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.

xiv. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

xv.   de Wit, A. (1988). Measurement of Project success. Project Management Journal, 6(3), 164-170.

xvi. Duimering, P.R., Ran, B., Derbentseva, N., & Poile, C. (2006). The Effects of Ambiguity on Project Task Structure in New Product Development, Knowledge and Process Management, 13(4), 239-251.

xvii.  Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What You Should Know About Mega Projects and Why: An Overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6-17.

xviii. Flyvbjerg, B., (Ed.). (2014). Megaproject planning and management: essential readings. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

xix. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Mega projects and Risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

 

xx.   Flyvbjerg, B., Garbuio, B., & Lovallo, D. (2009). Delusion and deception in large infrastructure projects: Two models for explaining and preventing executive disaster. California Management Review, 51(2), 170-193.

xxi. Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M.K.S. & Buhl, S.L. (2005). "How (In) accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects? The Case of Transportation." Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 131-146.

xxii.  Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M.K.S., & Buhl, S.L. (2004). What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects? Transport Reviews, 24 (1), 3-18.

xxiii. Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M.K.S., & Buhl, S.L. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie? Journal of American Planning Association, 68(3), 279-295.

xxiv. Gauthier, J-B., & Ika, L.A. (2012). Foundations of Project Management Research: An Explicit and Six-facet Ontological Framework. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 5-23.

xxv.  Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex     (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International          Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(9), 966 – 990.

xxvi. Ghosh, P., Williams, D., Askew, P., & Mulgund, V. (2012). Organizations and leaders make or break projects. Energy Perspectives, (Summer), 20-27.

xxvii. Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135-146.

xxviii. Government of Kenya. (2013). Second Medium Term Plan, 2013-2013. Kenya Vision 2030: Author.

xxix.   Hair, J.F., Babin, B., Money, A., & Samouel, P. (2003). The essentials of business research methods. London: Wiley.

xxx.    Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

xxxi.   Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H.G. (2001). Team work quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-         449.

xxxii.  Ika, L.A. (2009). Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6-19.

xxxiii.  Jugdev, K., & Muller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of        project success. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 19-31.

xxxiv.  Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: biases and corrective      procedures. In S. Makridakis, & S. C. Wheelwright (Eds.), Studies in the          Management Sciences: Forecasting, 12. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp.313–27.

xxxv.   Kellert, S. H. (1993). In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. University of  Chicago Press.

xxxvi. Koutsoyiannis, A. (1992). Theory of Econometrics (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Macmillan Education.

xxxvii.   Li, L., & Zigrid, N. (2006). The accuracy of risk-based cost estimation for water infrastructure projects: preliminary evidence from Australian Projects. Construction management and Economics (January 2010) 28, 89-100.

xxxviii. Likert, R. (1931). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archive of psychology, 22(140), 1-55.

xxxix.  Lim, C. S., & Mohamed, M.Z. (1999). Criteria of project success: An exploratory re-examination. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 243-248.

xl.     Liu, L., & Leitner, D. (2012). Simultaneous Pursuit of Innovation and Efficiency in Complex Engineering Projects-A Study of the Antecedents and Impacts of   Ambidexterity in Project Teams. Project Management Journal, 43(6), 97-110.

xli.   Livari, J., & Huisman, M. (2007). The Relationship Between Organizational Culture and   the Deployment of Systems Development Methodologies. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 35-58.

xlii. Loch, C.H., De Meyer, A., & Pich, M.T. (2006). Managing the unknown: A new approach to managing high uncertainty and risk in projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and         Sons.

xliii. Lovallo, D., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Delusions of success, how optimism undermines executives’ decisions.Harvard Business Review, 81 (7), 57–63.

xliv.  Love, P.E.D., Sing, C.-P., Wang, X., Irani, Z., & Thwala, D.W. (2012). Overruns in Transportation Infrastructure Projects. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering,     10(1),   141-159.

xlv. Lucas, T. (2009). Quantifying complexity. Website. www.calresco.org/lucas/quantify.htm. March 2015.

xlvi. Markus, M.L., & Mao, J.Y. (2004). Participants in development and implementation-Updating an old tired concept for today’s IS contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(11-12), 514-544.

xlvii. Maylor, H., Vidgen, R., & Carver, S. (2008). Managerial Complexity in Project based Operations: A grounded model and its implications for practice. Project Management Journal, 39(1), 15-26.

xlviii. McLeod, L., Doolin, B., & MacDonell, G. S. (2012). A Perspective-Based Understanding of Project Success. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 68-86.

xlix.                       Meyer, W. G. (2014). The Effect of Optimism Bias on the Decision to Terminate Failing Projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 7-20.

l.        Neuman, W.L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

li.      Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nded.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

lii.    O’Brien, R.M. (2007). A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673-690.

liii.  O’Donnell, J.G. (2010). A study of the relationships among project managers’ leadership practices, project complexity, and project success. East Eisenhower Parkway, USA: UMI Dissertation Publishing.

liv.   Olaniran, O.J., Love, P.E.D., Edwards, D., Olatunji, O.A., & Mathews, J. (2015). Cost Overruns in Hydrocarbon Megaprojects: A Critical Review and Implications for Research. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 126-138.

lv.     Papadopoulos, T., Ojiako, U., Chipulu, M., & Lee, K. (2012). The Criticality of Risk Factors in Customer Relationship Management Projects. Project Management Journal, 43(1), 65-75.

lvi.   Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D.P. (1988a). Project Success: Definition and Measurement Techniques. Project Management Journal, 19, 67-71.

lvii. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D.P. (1988b). Critical Success Factors in Effective Project Implementation. In D. I. Cleland & W.R. King (Eds.), Project Management Handbook, (2nd ed., pp. 479-512). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

lviii. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D.P. (1986). The Project Implementation Profile: New Tools for Project Managers. Project Management Journal, 17(4), 57-70.

lix.   Project Management Institute. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (5th ed.). Pennsylvania, USA: Author.

lx.  Project Management Institute. (2014). Navigating Complexity: A Practice Guide. Pennsylvania, USA: Author.

lxi. Remington, K., & Pollack, J. (2011). Tools for complex projects. In T. Cooke-Davies, L. Crawford, & C. Stevens, (Eds.), Aspects of Complexity: Managing Projects in a        Complex World, (pp. 29-38). Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.

lxii. Remington, K., & Zolin, R. (2011). Controlling Chaos? The Value of the Challenges of applying complexity theory to project management. In T. Cooke-Davies, L. Crawford, & C. Stevens, (Eds.), Aspects of Complexity: Managing Projects in a Complex World, (pp. 115-128). Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.

lxiii. Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007a).Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School    Press.

lxiv. Shenhar, A.J., & Dvir, D. (2007b). Project management research-The challenge and opportunity. Project Management Journal, 38(2), 93-99.

lxv. Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A.C. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), 699-725.

lxvi. Shore, B. (2008). Systematic Biases and Culture in Project Failure. Project Management Journal, 39(4), 5-13.

lxvii. Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68-76.

lxviii. Spector, P. (1992). Summated rating scale construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

lxix.   Sposito, V., Hand, M., & Skarpness, B. (1983). On the Efficiency of Using the Sample Kurtosis in Selecting Optimal Ipestimators. Communications in Statistics, Simulation and Computation, 12(3), 265-272.

lxx. Swartz, S.M. (2008). Managerial Perceptions of Project Stability. Project Management Journal, 39(4), 17-32.

lxxi. Wateridge, J. (1998). How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? International Journal of Project Management, 16(1), 59-63.

Cite this Article: