Please Wait! Your file will start to download within 10 seconds automatically. Otherwise click here Download

An Interpersonal Communication Aspect: The Power Of Moods In Interpreting Nonverbal Messages.


Prof. Canan MUTER SENGUL , Assist.Prof. Engin Deniz ERIS ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 51-54 | Views: 362 | Downloads: 111 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3456800

Volume 3 - June 2014 (06)


The social perception and cognitive functions are two key factors in determining social behavior by evaluating social cues and the emotional responses of others. Emotions play a fundamental role in human cognition and researches on emotional communication mainly focus on facial expressions. Previous researches show agreement on a universal set of emotions which are associated with specific facial displays. Present research is conducted in line with discrete emotion theory postulating that “affect programs for basic emotions produce prototypical response configurations that include emotion-specific patterns of facial expressions” (Scherer, Ellgring, 2007:113) in order to interpret the interpersonal communication process which is the issue in every part of life especially in professional stage. The current study aims to examine the effect of moods on the perception of facial images in the scope of the Affect Program Theory of Facial Displays (APT) proposed by Ekman (1997). The process is interpreted from the categorical perspective of the perception of facial images. In order to determine the short-term mood of the participants, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is administered and the facial expression images from the Pictures of Facial Affect (PFA) database (Ekman and Friesen, 2003) are used to measure the perception of facial images. The studied population of this preliminary study included 112 social sciences students. The results revealed a rather small negative effect of negative affectivity on affect perception throughtout facial pictures


Affect program theory of facial displays, positive and negative affectivity, pictures of facial affect, emotions


  1. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2003). Emotion in organizations: A multilevel perspective. In F.Dansrereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: Multilevel issues in organizational behavior and strategy (Vol. 2, pp. 9-54). Oxford, England: Elsevier/JAI Press.
  2. Bowen, J. L. (2014). Emotion in organizations: Resources for business educators. Journal of Management Education, 38(1), 114-142.
  3. Casciaro, T. (2014), Affect in Organizational Networks, in Daniel J. Brass, Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca, Ajay Mehra, Daniel S. Halgin, Stephen P. Borgatti (Ed.) Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 40), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.219-238.
  4. Ekman, P. (1973). Cross cultural studies of emotion. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review (pp. 169-222). New York: Academic Press.
  5. Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 268–287.
  6. Ekman, P. (2003). 16 Enjoyable Emotions. Emotion Researcher, 18, 6-7.
  7. Ekman, P. (1997). Lying and deception. In N. L. Stein, P. A. Ornstein, B. Tversky & C. Brainerd (Eds.), Memory for everyday and emotional events. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W. & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science, 221, 1208-1210.
  9. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Malor Books.
  10. Fisher, C. D. (2000). Mood and emotions while working: Missing pieces of job satisfaction? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 185-202.
  11. Hazelton, S. (2014). Positive emotions boost employee engagement. Human Resource Management International Digest, 22(1), 34-37.
  12. Scherer, K.R. & Ellgring, H. (2007). Are facial expressions of emotion produced by categorical affect programs or dynamically driven by appraisal?. Emotion, 7(1), 113-130.
  13. Schneider, F., Gur, C. R., Gur, R.E., and Muenz, L.R. (1993). Standardized mood induction with happy and sad facial expressions. Psychiatry Research, 51, 19-31.
  14. Watson, D., Clark, L.A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and valitadion of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
  15. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985) Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.

Cite this Article: