Please Wait! Your file will start to download within 10 seconds automatically. Otherwise click here Download

Green Washing and Consumer Behavior with Mediating Role of Green Skepticism and Moderating Role of Influencer Marketing in the FMCG Industry in Sri Lanka


M. S. Ishar Ali , T. Baskar ,

Download Full PDF Pages: 42-51 | Views: 182 | Downloads: 67 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7549927

Volume 11 - December 2022 (12)


It is very common that firms in FMCG industry claim to be green in the recent years increased in Sri Lanka but the reality is not very well known to them and most of them buy even without verifying the products claim. This study was intended to study the impact of green washing on consumer behavior with the mediating role of green skepticism and the moderating role of infuluencer marketing. Data were collected through online questionnaire using google form from 400 respondents using convenience sampling. Path analysis of structural equation modelling used to test the hypotheses, it is found out that the green washing has a significant relationship with consumer behavior and green skepticism. Green skepticism found to have significant relationship with consumer behavior and mediates the relationship between greenwashing and consumer behavior while influencer marketing moderates the relationship between green skepticism and consumer behavior; it means the customers tend to believe the green claims of firm in the FMCG industry to a great extent. Though they doubt about the claim the influencer shape their behavior towards buying the products claim to be green. Consumers were not sensitive to green washed products hence the acceptance of green washed products are very high.


Greenwashing, Green Skepticism, Influencer Marketing, Consumer Behavior


       i.        Adam. H., (2022). What Is Greenwashing? How It Works, Examples, and Statistics.

ii.      Carlyann Edwards., (2022). What Is Greenwashing?.

iii.    Johnstone, M.L., & Tan, L.P. (2015). An exploration of environmentally-conscious consumers and the reasons why they do not buy green product. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 804-825.

iv.     Kumar, R.; Tripathi, V., (2022). Green Advertising: Examining the Role of Celebrity’s Credibility Using SEM Approach. Glob. Bus. Rev, 23, 440–459.

v.       Martin D. & Schouten J. 2012. Sustainable Marketing. New Jersey. Prentice Hall.

vi.     Nguyen. T. T. H., Yang. Z., Nguyen. N., Johnson. L. W., & Cao. T. K., (2019). Greenwash and Green Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Green Skepticism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2653; doi:10.3390/su11092653

vii.   Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H. and Paladino, A. (2104). Perceived greenwashing: the interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 125 No. 4, pp. 693-707.

viii. Ottman J (2011) The new rules of green marketing, 1st edn. Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, pp 1–252

ix.     Pittman. M., & Abell. A., (2021).  More Trust in Fewer Followers: Diverging Effects of Popularity Metrics and Green Orientation Social Media Influencers. J. Interact. Mark. , 56, 70–82.

x.       Sekaran, U and Bougues,. (2013). Research methods for business, a skill-building approach, Sixth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

xi.     Sun, Y.; Luo, B.; Wang, S.; Fang, W., (2021). What You See Is Meaningful: Does Green Advertising Change the Intentions of Consumers to Purchase Eco-Labeled Products? Bus Strategy Environ. , 30, 694–704.

xii.   Weerasinghe.,D. R., (2019). Greenwashing: a pitfall in environmental sustainability.

xiii. Wielki, J., (2020). Analysis of the Role of Digital Influencers and Their Impact on the Functioning of the Contemporary On-Line Promotional System and Its Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12, 7138.

xiv. Zhang, L., Li, D., Cao, C., & Huang, S. (2018). The influence of greenwashing perception on green purchasing intentions: The mediating role of green word-of-mouth and moderating role of green concern. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187(3), 740–750.

Cite this Article: